Criterion 2 - Teaching-Learning and Evaluation
| 2.1 - Student Enrolment and Profile | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| 2.1.1 | QnM | Demand Ratio (Average of last five years) | View Documents |
| 2.1.2 | QnM | Average percentage of seats filled against reserved categories (SC, ST, OBC, Divyangjan, etc.) as per applicable reservation policy during the last five years | View Documents |
| 2.2 Catering to Student Diversity | |||
| 2.2.1 | QlM | The institution assesses the learning levels of the students and organises special Programmes for advanced learners and slow learners. | View Documents |
| 2.2.2 | QnM | Student - Full time teacher ratio (Data for the latest completed academic year) | View Documents |
| 2.3 Teaching-Learning Process | |||
| 2.3.1 | QlM | Student centric methods, such as experiential learning, participative learning and problem solving methodologies are used for enhancing their learning experiences | View Documents |
| 2.3.2 | QlM | Teachers use ICT- enabled tools including online resources for effective teaching and learning processes | View Documents |
| 2.3.3 | QnM | Ratio of students mentored for academic and other related issues (Data to be provided only for the latest completed academic year) | View Documents |
| 2.4 Teacher Profile and Quality | |||
| 2.4.1 | QnM | Average percentage of full time teachers appointed against the number of sanctioned posts during the last five years | View Documents |
| 2.4.2 | QnM | Average percentage of full time teachers with Ph.D./D.M/M.Ch./D.N.B Superspeciality/D.Sc./D'Lit. during the last five years | View Documents |
| 2.4.3 | QnM | Average teaching experience of full time teachers in the same institution (Data to be provided only for the latest completed academic year, in number of years) | View Documents |
| 2.4.4 | QnM | Average percentage of full time teachers who received awards, recognition, fellowships at the State, National, International level from Government/Govt. recognised bodies during the last five years | View Documents |
| 2.5 Evaluation Process and Reforms | |||
| 2.5.1 | QnM | Average number of days from the date of last semester-end/ year- end examination till the declaration of results during the last five years | View Documents |
| 2.5.2 | QnM | Average percentage of student complaints/grievances about evaluation against total number appeared in the examinations during the last five years | View Documents |
| 2.5.3 | QlM | IT integration and reforms in the examination procedures and processes (continuous internal assessment and end-semester assessment) have brought in considerable improvement in examination management system of the institution | View Documents |
| 2.5.4 | QnM | Status of automation of Examination division along with approved Examination Manual A. 100% automation of entire division & implementation of Examination Management System (EMS) B. Only student registration, Hall ticket issue & Result Processing C. Only student registration and result processing D. Only result processing E. Only manual methodology |
View Documents |
| 2.6 Student Performance and Learning Outcomes | |||
| 2.6.1 | QlM | The institution has stated learning outcomes (generic and programme specific)/graduate attributes which are integrated into the assessment process and widely publicized through the website and other documents | View Documents |
| 2.6.2 | QlM | Attainment of Programme Outcomes, Programme Specific Outcomes and Course Outcomes are evaluated by the institution | View Documents |
| 2.6.3 | QnM | Pass percentage of students (Data to be provided only for the latest completed academic year) | View Documents |
| 2.7 Student Satisfaction Survey | |||
| 2.7.1 | QnM | Online Student Satisfaction Survey regarding the teaching-learning process. | View Documents |
Page last updated on April, 2023